A structured approach to difficult conversations. Transforms subjective criticism into objective, actionable feedback.
How to Give Proper Feedback?
Have you ever faced a tough conversation at work, maybe delivering feedback or resolving a misunderstanding, and struggled to find the right words? It’s easy to get stuck between being too blunt or too vague.
If the above cases hit your pain point, then the COIN model will help you out.
What is the COIN Model
COIN model is a simple framework to make every important conversation clear, respectful, and constructive.
At its core, COIN stands for Context, Observation, Impact, and Next Steps.
It is designed to structure conversations—especially those involving feedback—in a way that’s clear, objective, and actionable.
Core Concept of COIN
Now let’s break it down:
Context
Set the scene. Why are you having this conversation?
Observation
Share specific, fact-based observations without interpretation or judgment.
Impact
Explain the effect of the behavior or situation on others, the team, or goals.
Next Steps
Collaboratively discuss solutions, actions, or future behaviors to address the situation.
Examples
- Context: Let’s talk about the recent project deadlines.
- Observation: I noticed three reports were submitted a few days past the deadline.
- Impact: This delayed the team’s ability to move forward and caused some stress in meeting client expectations.
- Next Steps: “How can we ensure your future deadlines are met on time? Do you need support or resources?
- Context: During our client presentation yesterday
- Observation: I noticed you interrupted the client several times while they were speaking
- Impact: This made them hesitant to share their full feedback and slowed down the discussion.
- Next Steps: In the future, let’s aim to actively listen and wait for them to finish before jumping in.
Advanced - The Connection to FIRE
After providing feedback, you should expect a response. The FIRE model can help structure that response effectively.
To use the FIRE model to react to COIN, you can structure your response in a way that acknowledges the feedback and builds on it constructively (a coincidence: both models consist of four elements, which align perfectly for reactions):
Context (COIN) & Facts (FIRE)
Begin by acknowledging the situation and the facts presented.
Affirm the context and objective facts shared in COIN to ensure clarity about the event or behavior.
Observation (COIN) & Interpretations (FIRE)
Respond to the specific observation by offering your interpretation.
If you disagree with the observation, explain your perspective clearly, while staying focused on the facts.
Impact (COIN) & Reactions (FIRE)
React to the impact shared in COIN.
Express your emotional response to the situation or the effect it had, but do so in a constructive way. This is where you can share how you felt or how the situation affected you or the team.
Next Steps (COIN) & Ends (FIRE)
Address the suggested next steps from COIN by offering your thoughts on possible solutions or adjustments.
Define your desired outcome, showing your commitment to finding a positive resolution.
When to Use the COIN Model
The COIN model works in various scenarios where clarity and mutual understanding are essential:
- Giving Feedback: Whether it’s recognizing great performance or addressing a challenge, COIN ensures your message is clear and productive.
- Resolving Conflicts: It helps break down emotionally charged issues into manageable discussions.
- Performance Reviews: Use COIN to provide balanced, actionable insights during formal reviews.
- Team Check-ins: For discussing how behaviors or processes impact team dynamics and suggesting improvements.
Takeaway
COIN works because it removes judgment from feedback.
By grounding the conversation in context, observable facts, and future action, feedback becomes a shared problem-solving process rather than a personal attack.
